I think a “try before you buy” arrangement is a great way for companies to assess a candidate’s capability and for a candidate to prove his/her value and decide whether the job is a good fit. In a try before you buy arrangement the candidate begins working for the employer before an agreement is reached.
Benefits to candidate
- Proof: Allows the candidate to concretely prove how much they can contribute to the company. Resumes and job interviews are only so effective – proof is much more telling. I think this is especially important for someone changing career paths – their background might not do their independent and natural skill-set justice.
- Culture: Allows the candidate to see if they like the team and company culture.
- Work: Allows the candidate to see if they will enjoy their role
Potential downsides to candidate
- Time: Time spent working for free could be spent on other opportunities. This would be especially frustrating if he/she does not get hired. Employer could offer small payment for work completed to compensate.
- Reputation: Candidate may seem desperate. To avoid this, read some of my logistical recommendations below.
- Abuse/Commitment: Candidate may be at risk of being taken advantage of (used for free work). Avoid this by making sure it’s a reputable company, that they’re serious about hiring someone full-time and that you meet the description of someone that they would actually consider hiring.
Benefits to employer
- Proof: I can’t think of a better way to assess a candidate’s capabilities than to have him/her do the job.
- Dedication: Employer can be confident that the candidate is truly dedicated to the company and passionate about the opportunity if they’re willing start adding value to the company before a formal agreement is reached.
- Culture: Employer can determine whether the candidate is a good cultural fit.
Potential downsides to employer
- Turnover: Allocating time and giving responsibility to someone who doesn’t end up joining the company can be time consuming.
- Poaching: By waiting to sign the employee, the candidate could accept a role with a different company before the company can sign him/her.
To make sure the arrangement is mutually beneficial, I offer the following recommendations:
- Don’t make it a full-time commitment. It’s unreasonable to ask the candidate to drop everything else he/she is working on. Hours should be flexible if the candidate has a full-time job.
- Discuss what an agreement might look like should the trial period go well. You don’t want to get into a situation where it’s time to come to reach an employment offer and the two sides can’t agree the terms.
- Lay out the conditions of the trial period ahead of time – ie. duration, expectations, etc.
- Have regular performance reviews.
- Make sure employer and candidate truly believe it will be a good fit. Do a bit of resume and job interview stuff ahead of time.
I think working for free is a great way for a candidate to prove how much value he/she can add and I can’t think of a better way for an employer to assess a candidate. I hope and think that we will see this type of arrangement happen more and more.
Get 10x More Interviews
Sign up to get your free ebook on getting cust dev interviews